Kevin Kelly - “Web 3.0″
28.July, 2009
Northern California Grantmakers
& The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Present:
Web & Where 2.0+
Feb. 14th, 2008
Session #11
Kevin Kelly
“Web 3.0″
Duration : 0:42:9
[youtube J132shgIiuY]
Northern California Grantmakers
& The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Present:
Web & Where 2.0+
Feb. 14th, 2008
Session #11
Kevin Kelly
“Web 3.0″
Duration : 0:42:9
[youtube J132shgIiuY]
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
awesome video
awesome video
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
Im like WEB 3.11 …
Im like WEB 3.11 better
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
noob1022222222222222
noob1022222222222222
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
I’m surprised he …
I’m surprised he didn’t include community in his list of generatives.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
Hello 28:00
o 28:00
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
Interesting the …
Interesting the growth happened and yet to come.
Lisa
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
@cybersphere - well …
@cybersphere - well put
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
such a cute comment …
such a cute comment , chillz
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
Is that it? Wow! …
Is that it? Wow! YOU are irritated by the woman who is sitting next to him? Should we explore your reasons for this?They are clearly of great importance. There must have been something she was not or something that she was failing to do that was of immense importance to you. I cannot fathom how you managed to endure 40 minutes of debate about such vital issues. Or perhaps you are being ironic and are much cleverer than would appear at first glance. That’s it! You’ve found me out! !
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
that women in the …
that women in the background is annoying
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
i remember the tv …
i remember the tv series The 21st Century (back in the 60s); it was mostly about robots and television and stuff like that; the was some, but not much about computers;
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
Furthermore, the …
Furthermore, the economic collapse is actually accelerating a commercial shift to the web. Why? Because it’s simply far more cost effective for the consumer and supplier. Also, augmented reality presents an opportunity to have our personal avatar simulate the physicalities of clothes shopping.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
The Internet …
The Internet doesn’t require petrol to run.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
This model is based …
This model is based on the umption that people are good. I do not like the idea of this One computer controlling my environment. Especially when people are not good.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
It’s only a problem …
It’s only a problem when only certain people are transparent and/or certain people have access to the information. Being as these situations allow for an unbalanced allotment of information. However, when everyone is transparent the information will be much less valuable and much further from the seemingly intrusive nature. The government already knows your full name, social security number, spouse, kids, address, bank accounts, etc. The rest is all fluff, e.g. your friends, hobbies, pets.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
How is this ” …
How is this “predicted upon a petro-collapse”? The internet exists, already. If you take a look at the google cloud, torrents, photosynth, processing clusters and many other newer internet dependent technologies you’ll realize that at least the essentials of this idea are common sense.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
Of course, all this …
Of course, all this is predicated upon a petro-collapse not happening.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
what about the …
what about the possiable abuse of having centeralised information by large organisations e.g. governments, companies. Centeralised infromation has been abused before e.g. Richard nixion used the CIA to harass\blackmail people that did not want to fight in vitnam.
Also if everyone is transparent how can we have security e.g. terrorists,thieves. because making every in world transprant is not enforceable.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
love his thinking
love his thinking
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
sorry my typo..I …
sorry my typo..I meant ubiquitous..
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
This is about …
This is about Ubiquious: How cloud computing (the web/one machine/etc) can enable it and how it can be enhanced by augmented reality..
..WEB 3.0 is just another trivial term for marketing..
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
This won’t happen …
This won’t happen if we don’t work out how to avoid environmental catastrophe. We simply don’t have the resources to get there if they are eaten up by insatiable economic growth. This particular planet may not be quite big enough to support this natural progression to the technological future. While the net may be this indestructible machine, the massive real-world infrastructures - shipping, mining, manufacture, agriculture, etc. - are far more vulnerable to systemic failure.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
is there any …
is there any difference between the Sun’s Solaris and web 3? I dont see the fundamental difference.
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
Cloudbook.. a PC …
Normal PC’s have Bytes and etc. for storing purposes.. That would no longer be necessary, everything would just be stored on the net.. :D:D:D:D
Cloudbook.. a PC that only functions as a window to the internet.. It’s always online, and everything you save, “down”-load or create will be on the internett!!
I actually just saw it on the news on TV.. The “Net 3″..
28.July, 2009 um 2:54 am
True.. With the new …
True.. With the new digitalized world it would be impossible for one person, country or a group to control it.. Since the net is accessable to all, and also modifiable to all.. Everyone would “control” it..